THE ROLE OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN ENSURING THE STATE'S ECONOMIC SECURITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2616-9193.2025/21-6/11

Keywords:

economic security of the state, social entrepreneurship, integral assessment, innovative development, state regulation.

Abstract

Background. In the context of current challenges related to Ukraine's post-war recovery, ensuring the state's economic security becomes particularly relevant. Social entrepreneurship is viewed as a potential tool for stabilizing the socio-economic system, which can help address issues such as employment for vulnerable populations, reintegration of internally displaced persons and veterans, and restoration of regions affected by military actions. However, empirical research on the impact of social entrepreneurship on state economic security remains limited. In particular, there are no quantitative assessments of the relationship between social entrepreneurship sector development and economic security indicators. The Ukrainian methodology for assessing economic security does not include indicators related to social entrepreneurship, making it difficult to understand its real contribution to strengthening the state's economic resilience. Therefore, this research aims to fill this gap by conducting correlation analysis between the number of social enterprises in Ukraine and economic security sub-indices, which will empirically evaluate the nature and strength of this relationship. Research object. Social entrepreneurship in the context of ensuring the state's economic security.

Methods. A comprehensive approach was applied to analyze Ukraine's economic security in the context of social entrepreneurship development. Theoretical research methods included analysis and synthesis of scientific literature to systematize the main approaches to evaluating economic security and social entrepreneurship. The logical method was used to construct the research sequence, structure the main analysis stages, and summarize the obtained results. The systematic approach helped identify relationships between economic security components and evaluate the integrating role of social entrepreneurship in ensuring it. The empirical part of the research was based on statistical methods of data processing and analysis. Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis were used to assess the dynamics and structure of economic security.

Results. The historical evolution of methodological approaches to economic security assessment was analyzed, which evolved from military-centric models to integrative concepts that consider socio-economic aspects. It was established that modern approaches increasingly emphasize the role of economic systems' resilience in ensuring state security, making research into innovative tools such as social entrepreneurship relevant. The impact of social entrepreneurship on Ukraine's economic security was evaluated. It was found that this sector contributes to the stability of the social component of the economy and has a positive effect on regional development, particularly through job creation for vulnerable populations. Correlation analysis confirmed the relationship between social entrepreneurship development and investment innovation processes, as well as the importance of integrating social initiatives into economic security strategies.

Сonclusion. The ability of social entrepreneurship to address key socio-economic issues, such as creating jobs for vulnerable populations and supporting sustainable regional development, has been proven. However, the level of social entrepreneurship development in Ukraine significantly lags behind EU countries, highlighting the need for state support, legislation improvement, and creation of a favorable regulatory environment. Social entrepreneurship has strong potential and serves as a stabilizing factor during periods of economic instability, but requires integration into economic security strategies to maximize its impact on economic system resilience. Correlation analysis of data demonstrated the relationship between social entrepreneurship and investment-innovation processes, and showed the need for integrating social initiatives into economic security strategies.

References

Богацька, Н. (2023). Перспективи розвитку соціального підприємництва в Україні. Економіка та суспільство, 53. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-53-4

Гурочкіна, В. В., & Браунагель, А. В. (2023). Соціальні підприємства в умовах війни VS ринок праці та демографічна ситуація України. Сталий розвиток економіки, 3(50), 271–282. https://economdevelopment.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/1031/987

Каменко, В. (2020). Соціальне підприємництво в Україні: Економіко-правовий аналіз. EU4YOUTH – розкриття потенціалу молодих соціальних підприємців в Молдові та Україні. EU4Youth. Прямуємо разом. https://euneighbourseast.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/legal-report-in-ukraine_ukrainian_1.pdf

Назарук, В. (2024, 9 січня). Соціальне підприємництво в умовах війни: ліки чи плацебо? Економічна правда. https://epravda.com.ua/columns/2024/01/9/708567/

Теслюк, С., & Демчук, І. (2023). Розвиток соціального підприємництва в Україні в умовах воєнного стану. Економічний часопис Волинського національного університету імені Лесі Українки, 4(32), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.29038/2786-4618-2022-04-116-125

Юрченко, О., & Свирида, О. (2022). Соціальні підприємства в Україні: Стан та проблеми розвитку. Цифрова економіка та економічна безпека, 3, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.32782/dees.3-13

Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2009). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton University Press.

Aldasoro, I., & Alves, I. (2018). Multiplex interbank networks and systemic importance: An application to European data. Journal of Financial Stability, 35, 17–37.

Baldwin, R., & Weder di Mauro, B. (2020). Economics in the time of COVID-19. CEPR Press.

Bosma, N., Schøtt, T., Terjesen, S., & Kew, P. (2015). Special topic report: Social entrepreneurship. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-2015-report-on-socialentrepreneurship

Brende, B., & Sternfels, B. (2022, June 7). Resilience for sustainable, inclusive growth. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/risk-and-resilience/our-insights/resilience-for-sustainableinclusive-growth

Briñolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.

Buzan, B., & Hansen, L. (2009). The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge University Press.

Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Blackwell Publishers.

Choi, J., & Lambert, J. H. (2017). Advances in risk analysis with big data. Risk Analysis, 37(8), 1435–1442.

Cooper, R. N. (1972). Economic interdependence and foreign policy in the seventies, World Politics, 24(2), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009735

El Gibari, S., Gómez, T., & Ruiz, F. (2019). Building composite indicators using multicriteria methods: A review. Journal of Business Economics, 89(1), 1–24.

Galbraith, J. K. (1973). Economics and the public purpose. Houghton Mifflin. https://archive.org/details/economicspublicp00galb_0

Grant, R. M. (1991). Porter's 'Competitive advantage of nations': An assessment. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), 535–548.

Kahler, M. (2004). Economic security in an era of globalization: Definition and provision. The Pacific Review, 17(4), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951274042000326032

Kindleberger, C. P. (1973). The world in depression, 1929–1939.

University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700089580

Kirshner, J. (1998). Political economy in security studies after the cold war. Review of International Political Economy, 5(1), 64–91.

Kshetri, N. (2021). Artificial intelligence in developing countries: Opportunities and threats. IEEE IT Professional, 23(4), 24–29.

Lake, D. A. (1993). Leadership, hegemony, and the international economy: Naked emperor or tattered monarch with potential? International Studies Quarterly, 37(4), 459–489.

Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2013). Methods for constructing composite

indices: One for all or all for one? Rivista Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, 67(2), 67–80.

Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind. Dartmouth Libraries. https://www.clubofrome.org/publication/the-limits-to-growth/

Nordhaus, W. D. (2017). The climate casino: Risk, uncertainty, and economics for a warming world. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300203813

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press. https://dowbor.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/14Thomas-Piketty.pdf

Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2009). This time is different: Eight centuries of financial folly. Princeton University Press.

Rodrik, D. (2021). Why does globalization fuel populism? Economics, culture, and the rise of right-wing populism. Annual Review of Economics, 13, 133–170. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-070220-032416

Rostow, W. W. (1991). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625824

Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum. https://archive.org/details/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-schwab-2016

Simanavičienė, Ž., & Stankevičius, A. (2015). Economic security and national competitiveness. Public Security and Public Order, 15, 126–143.

Singer, J. D. (1981). Correlates of war II: Testing some realpolitik models. International Affairs, 57(2), 322–323. https://doi.org/10.2307/2619173

Singer, J. D., Bremer, S., & Stuckey, J. (1972). Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820–1965. In B. Russett (Ed.), Peace, war, and numbers (pp. 19–48). Sage.

Stiglitz, J. E. (1998). Towards a new paradigm for development: Strategies, policies and processes. Prebisch Lecture at UNCTAD. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/prebisch9th.en.pdf

Published

2025-06-27

How to Cite

GURA, V., & NECHYPORENKO, K. (2025). THE ROLE OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN ENSURING THE STATE’S ECONOMIC SECURITY. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Public Administration, 21(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.17721/2616-9193.2025/21-6/11

Similar Articles

1-10 of 24

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)