THE EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF CHINA'S PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR SYSTEM IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION: A CASE STUDY OF HANGZHOU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/2616-9193.2025/22-4/14Keywords:
China, digital government, public administrator, digital transformation.Abstract
B a c k g r o u n d . Under the wave of global digitalization, governments are reshaping public management. China has made digital government a national strategy, but policy implementation relies on public administrators. This paper aims to explore the evolution and innovation mechanism of China's public administrator system in the context of digital transformation, and analyzes it by taking Hangzhou as an example.
M e t h o d s . This study mainly adopts a combination of literature research, historical method, comparative method, comprehensive analysis, and case study. The historical method is used to trace the institutional evolution of China's public administrator system from the "unit system" to the "post system." The comparative method allows cross-regional comparison between Hangzhou and other provinces, highlighting local innovation characteristics. The comprehensive method integrates multi-source data (policy texts, reports, and digital platform outcomes) to synthesize a holistic understanding of institutional transformation under digitalization.
R e s u l t s . Chinese public administrators are divided into on-the-job and non-staffed, and the personnel are divided into administrative and career establishments, and the way of entry affects career development. The digital transformation of Hangzhou has significantly promoted the adjustment of job setting and staffing. For example, "City Brain 3.0" introduces AI models to improve administrative efficiency. The digital management platform for civil servants has improved the efficiency of personnel management. The reform of "one thing at a time" of government services reduces administrative posts and supports the reuse of establishment. Hangzhou has also trained administrators in digital capabilities through Zhejiang University, and established a "dynamic staffing pool" and a "digital talent pool" to solve cross-departmental collaboration problems and improve the efficiency of emergency response and task execution.
C o n c l u s i o n s . The Hangzhou model has formed a collaborative governance innovation model of "platform + talent +system". However, its promotion faces challenges: high dependence on the high-end talent market and large salary gap inside and outside the system. Generalization is limited, and Hangzhou's success depends on its digital economy foundation, which is not suitable for underdeveloped areas. In addition, the risk of "data-only" cannot be ignored, which may lead to excessive focus on quantitative indicators and neglect of humanistic care.
References
Action plan for promoting big data development. (2015). State Council [in Chinese]. [ 促 进 大 数 据 发 展 行 动 纲 要 . (2015). 国 务 院 ]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-09/05/content_10137.htm
The 14th Five-Year Plan for Promoting National E-government. (2021). National Development and Reform Commission [in Chinese]. [十四五”推进国 家 政 务 信 息 化 规 划 . (2021). 国 家 发 展 和 改 革 委 员 会 ]. https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/ghwb/202201/P020220106387085514202.pdf
The OECD Digital Government Policy Framework: Six dimensions of a Digital Government. (2020). OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2a-en
United Nations E-Government Survey 2022: The future of digital government. (2022). United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://desapublications.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/2022-09/Web%20version%20E-Government%202022.pdf
Wang Lefu. (2003). On public leadership: The relationship between public leadership and public management and its research significance. Management World, 12, 51–56 [in Chinese]. [王乐福. (2003). 论公共领导:公 共 领 导 与 公 共 管 理 的 关 系 及 其 研 究 意 义 . 管 理 世 界 , 12, 51–56]. https:doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2003.12.007
Zhou Zhiren. (2014). Zhou Zhiren delivered a speech. In Evaluation and Development of China's Leadership Talents: Selected Papers of the 2014 China Leadership Forum and the 4th Seminar on Quality Standards and Development Strategies of Party, Government and Enterprise Leadership Talents (pp. 23–24). People's Publishing House [in Chinese]. [周志仁。(2014)。周志仁发表讲话。 载于《中国领导人才的评价与培养: 2014 年中国领导人才论坛暨第四届党政企业领导人才素质标准与发展战略研讨会论文选集》 (第 23–24 页. People's Publishing House)].
Wang Xiang, & Yu Xiao. (2023). The structural impact of institutional pressure on local government digital talent demands: Based on the background of government digital transformation. E-government, 8, 10–21 [in Chinese]. [王翔, 于晓. (2023). 制度压力对地方政府数字人才需求的结构性 影 响 : 基 于 政 府 数 字 化 转 型 背 景 . 电 子 政 务 , 8, 10–21]. https:doi.org/10.16582/j.cnki.dzzw.2023.08.002
Xu Feng. (2020). Explanation of the digital transformation mechanism of local governments: An analysis based on the "Zhejiang Experience" of Government Affairs Reform. E-government, 10, 2–19 [in Chinese]. [徐峰. (2020). 地方政府数字化转型机制解析: 基于浙江省政务改革经验的分析. 电子政务, 10, 2–19]. https:doi.org/10.16582/j.cnki.dzzw.2020.10.001
Cao Qinglong, & Zhang Jinchen. (2022). Analysis and countermeasures of personnel training in our country's public sector in the new era. Advances in Social Sciences, 11, Article 3493 [in Chinese]. [曹庆龙, 张金臣. (2022). 新时代我国公共部门人才培养的分析与对策. 社会科学进展, 11, 第 3493 条]. https://www.hanspub.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=55297
Liang Zheng. (2021). Urban Brain: Operational mechanism, governance efficiency and optimization path. People's Forum Academic Frontiers, 9, 58–65 [in Chinese]. [梁铮. (2021). 城市大脑: 运行机制、治理效率及优化路径.人 民 论 坛 学 术 前 沿 , 9, 58–65]. https://www.rmlt.com.cn/2021/0818/622305.shtml
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Be sure to check the conditions by the link bellow: https://gov.bulletin.knu.ua/7
