JUSTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF AN EFFECTIVE MODEL OF BUREAUCRACY IN THE CONDITIONS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF UKRAINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/2616-9193.2023/17-6/7Keywords:
effective model of bureaucracy; M. Weber; public administration; Public Service; digital bureaucracy; democratizationAbstract
The relevance of this article lies in the need to conduct a study of the institution of bureaucracy, as well as to find and establish an effective model of bureaucracy, which in turn will contribute to the democratization of Ukraine and the solution of the problems that exist in the bureaucracy system at the moment. The purpose of the study is to analyze the features of the bureaucracy, determine its purpose and expediency, and in connection with that, develop an effective and efficient model of the bureaucracy. The following methods were used in this article: dialectical method, historical and hermeneutic methods, formal-legal method, institutional method, logical method, method of induction and deduction, method of modeling and system analysis, axiomatic method and others. The results of the study are the definition of the main concepts and terms, namely: "bureaucracy" and other terms and concepts that were used within the scope of this study; clarification of the essence and purpose of the institution of bureaucracy; establishing the stages and history of the development of the institution of bureaucracy in the world in general, and in Ukraine in particular; analysis of existing models of bureaucracy in the world and clarification of their features; researching the system of bureaucracy in Ukraine and establishing the model of bureaucracy that is used in Ukraine; identification of problems characteristic of the institution of bureaucracy in Ukraine and research and establishment of means and processes that are necessary for improving the mechanisms of state administration in Ukraine. The provisions laid down in this article are of practical value, first of all, for state bodies and authorized persons, whose powers include the provision of services in various spheres of life, and whose functions include the improvement of the civil service institute. Also, this study will be interesting for people who apply to state bodies or officials with the issue of solving problems in various spheres of social life.
References
1. Батрименко О. В. Трансформація радянської моделі бюрократії в постсоціалістичній Україні. Київ, 2018. 6 с. URL: https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Batrymenko_Oleh/Transformatsiia_radianskoi_modeli_biurokratii_v_postsotsialistychnii_Ukraini.pdf
2. Божко П. А. Моделі та концепції модернізації державного управління. Вісник ХНУ імені В. Н. Каразіна, серія "Питання політології". 2019. Вип. 35. С. 28-36. URL: https://periodicals.karazin.ua/politology/article/view/14332/13487
3. Демченко Л. Критика теорії і практики бюрократії. Аспекти публічного управління. Том 7. № 5. 2019. С. 5–11. URL: https://aspects.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/download/596/579
4. Дзьоба Т. Цифрова бюрократія сприяє зміцненню економіки країни та мінімізації корупції. Міністкрство аграрної політики та продовольства України. 2021. URL: https://minagro.gov.ua/news/cifrovabyurokratiya-spriyaye-zmicnennyu-ekonomiki-krayini-ta-minimizaciyikorupciyi-taras-dzoba
5. Про адміністративну процедуру : Закон України. Document 2073-IX. 2022. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2073-20#Text
6. Про державну службу : Закон України. Відомості Верховної Ради (ВВР). 2016. № 4, ст. 43. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/889-19#Text
7. Кагановська Т. Є. Вплив бюрократії на організацію управлінської діяльності: історико-правовий аналіз. Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія"ПРАВО". 2019. Вип. 28. С. 11–18. URL: https://periodicals.karazin.ua/law/article/view/14687/14013
8. Перепелиця Н. Бюрократія в системі сучасної демократії в концепції Ф. Фукуями : дис. … д-ра політ. наук. Київ. 2020. 210 с. URL: https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Perepelytsia_Nataliia/Biurokratiia_v_systemi_suchasnoi_demokratii_v_kontseptsii_F_Fukuiamy.pdf?PHPSESSID=3eq0o957rg4t47ccuqq8afdpt6
9. Солдатенко О. Основні концепції розвитку державної служби. ПУЕТ. 2020. С. 97–102. URL: http://dspace.puet.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/10470/1/%D0%9D.%20%D0%A1.%20%D0%86%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE.pdf
10. Bertrand M., Burgess R., Chawla А., Xu G. The Glittering Prizes: Career Incentives and Bureaucrat Performance. The Review of Economic Studies. 2020. № 87(2). Р. 626–655. URL: https://academic.oup.com/restud/article-abstract/87/2/626/5498709
11. Draper Hal. Karl Marx's Theory of Revolution. Vol. 1: State and Bureaucracy. Monthly Review Press. Revised ed. Edition. 1977. Р. 272. URL: https://monthlyreview.org/product/karl_marxs_theory_of_revolution_vol_i/
12. Fedosov V., Payentko T. Ukrainian bureaucracy: conceptual principles and peculiarities of functioning. Securities Market of Ukraine magazine. 2016. № 9-10. Р. 14. URL: http://securities.usmdi.org/PDF/1031.pdf
13. Sager Fritz, Rosser Christian. Weberian Bureaucracy. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford, 2021. URL: https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-166;jsessionid=4B175A239789D82F95299D30E62A2588
14. Fukuyama F. State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century : Messenger Lectures. Cornell University Press. 2004. Р. 160. URL: https://www.amazon.com/State-Building-Governance-World-OrderCentury/dp/0801442923
15. Gulzar S, Pasquale В. Politicians, Bureaucrats, and Development: Evidence from India. American Political Science Review. 2017. № 111(1). Р. 162–183. URL: https://econpapers.repec.org/article/cupapsrev/v_3a111_3ay_3a2017_3ai_3a01_3ap_3a162-183_5f00.htm
16. Jenei György. The Impact of the Theory of Max Weber on Bureaucracy to our Present Day. Journal of Economic Literature. Civic Review. 2021. Vol. 17. Special Issue. Р. 218–240. URL: http://real.mtak.hu/144409/1/psz_2021_17_eng_16.pdf
17. Kapisa T. Types of bureaucracy : Guide for students. 2021. URL: https://www.zambianguardian.com/types-of-bureaucracy/
18. Nagel M., Peters B. Identity and Representation: Representative Bureaucracy in the European Union. Political Identification in Europe: Community in Crisis? Bingley : Emerald Publishing Limited. 2021. P. 161-178.
19. Payenkto T., Fedosov V. Theories and concepts of the development of bureaucracy: a retrospective analysis. Securities market of Ukraine. 2017. № 9–10. Р. 17–31. URL: https://ir.kneu.edu.ua/handle/2010/21247?show=full&locale-attribute=uk
20. Ravishankar N. The Cost of Ruling: Anti-Incumbency in Elections. Economic and Political Weekly. 2009. № 44(10). Р. 92-98. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261891054_The_Cost_of_Ruling_Anti-Incumbency_in_Elections
21. Rogger D. Publication: The Consequences of Political Interference in Bureaucratic Decision Making. Policy Research Working Paper. Public Disclosure Authorized. 2018. Р. 47. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/d2281854-5b3f-54c3-90c4-c99852d865c7/content
22. Scot А. Bureaucracy: advantages and disadvantages. Global Journal of Sociology and Authropology. 2021. №11 (2). URL: https://www.internationalscholarsjournals.com/articles/bureaucracyadvantages-and-disadvantages.pdf
23. Stojanovski S., Denkova J., Trajkov P. Weber's Models Of Bureaucracy In The Age Of Globalization. First international scientific conference: social change in the global world, Shtip. 2014. Р. 873-882. URL: https://eprints.ugd.edu.mk/11852/2/20.Strashko%20Stojanovski%2C%20Jadranka%20Denkova%2C%20Petar%20Trajkov.pdf
24. Thijs N., Hammerschmid G., Palaric E. A comparative overview of public administrationcharacteristics andperformance in EU28. Social Europe. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2017. Р. 108. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=19208&langId=en
25. Varzar P. Democracy and bureaucracy: compatibility issue. Forms of political power. Political management. 2010. № 1. Р. 76-87. URL: https://ipiend.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/varzar_demokratiia.pdf
26. Vashchuk V. Bureaucracy as a source of state modernization: prospects, challenges, conflicts. Master's thesis. National Technical University Kyiv Polytechnic Institute named after Ihor Sikorskyi. 2020. Р. 102. URL: https://ela.kpi.ua/bitstream/123456789/38318/1/Vashchuk_V_magistr.pdf
27. Weber M. Economy and society : an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1978. 639 р. URL: https://archive.org/details/economysociety00webe/page/6/mode/2up
28. Weber M. The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. University of California Libraries. 1930. 322 р. URL: https://archive.org/details/protestantethics00webe
29. Wilson W. The Study of Administration. The Academy of Political Science. Political Science Quarterly. 1887. Vol. 2. № 2. Р. 197-222 . URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2139277#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Be sure to check the conditions by the link bellow: https://gov.bulletin.knu.ua/7
