SELECTED ISSUES REGARDING THE CHALLENGES OF IMPLEMENTING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PRINCIPLES IN THE SPHERE OF PARLIAMENTARISM

Abstract

Background. Modern parliamentarism functions not only as an institutional form of representative democracy but also as a specific subsystem of public governance that requires effective administration based on democratic values and the principles of good governance. In Ukraine, the effective implementation of public administration principles in the field of parliamentarism is particularly relevant in the context of administrative reforms and alignment with European standards. Given the complexity of the political system, growing public expectations, and increasing demands for accountability, there is a pressing need to explore how such principles as popular sovereignty, rule of law, transparency, accountability, efficiency, inclusiveness, professionalism, and interaction with civil society are operationalized within the parliamentary framework.

Methods. The methodological basis of the study is an interdisciplinary approach that combines the analysis of academic literature, legal and regulatory acts, parliamentary reports, and empirical studies of parliamentary institutions. Special attention is given to the comparative analysis of the implementation of key principles in EU countries, particularly Sweden, Estonia, and the United Kingdom, in order to assess the compliance of Ukrainian practices with European standards of good governance. Specific focus is placed on the principles of professionalism and civic engagement.

Results. The study identifies major challenges to the implementation of the professionalism principle, including the politicization of the administrative apparatus, insufficient training for parliamentarians, limited resources for professional development, and a low level of ethical compliance. In terms of civic engagement, problems include the formalized nature of public consultations, limited public participation in the legislative process, and low trust in parliamentary institutions. The comparative analysis revealed best practices, such as the establishment of consultative councils, mandatory training programs for MPs, and institutionalized transparency through digital platforms.

Conclusions. The results confirm the necessity of systematic reform in the area of parliamentary administration, drawing on international experience. The study recommends implementing comprehensive educational programs for parliamentarians, creating permanent feedback mechanisms with the public, improving the ethical infrastructure of parliaments, and expanding the use of digital technologies in legislative processes. This integrated approach would enhance the legitimacy and efficiency of parliamentary activity, strengthen democratic governance, and increase public trust in state institutions. Future research could focus on the empirical evaluation of implemented reforms and their impact on the quality of legislation.