THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION IN THE HARMONIZATION OF THE LEGISLATION AND REFORM OF ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURES OF THE CANDIDATE COUNTRIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2616-9193.2024/20-7/12

Keywords:

european integration, public administration, democratization, harmonization of law, Ukraine, EU, principles of European integration

Abstract

Background. The article examines the role played by the European Union in ensuring the compliance of the legislation of candidate countries with EU law and the adaptation of administrative structures in candidate countries seeking to join the EU. Strict Copenhagen criteria characterize EU enlargement policy and require legislative and administrative reforms from candidate countries to bring legislation and management structures into compliance with EU standards. These reforms are critical to ensuring stable institutions, democracy, the rule of law, and human rights. Examining the transformative impact of these requirements, the presented research highlights how compliance with EU norms contributes to good governance, improved public service delivery, economic development, and strengthens institutional capacity in candidate countries.

Methods. Research methods are modern general and special methods of scientific knowledge, among which in particular: analysis was used to process scientific, analytical, and legislative sources; inductive and deductive – for analysis and generalization of information on the subject of research; forecasting and synthesis was used during the formulation of conclusions and recommendations based on the results of the study.

Results. The study of the role of the European Union in the harmonization of legislation and the reform of the administrative structures of the candidate countries showed that the influence of the EU is a decisive factor in the successful introduction of changes to the legal framework and the reform of the institutional system of these countries. It has been established that harmonizing national legislation with the acquis communautaire contributes to increasing the level of independence of justice, ensuring economic stability and social welfare in candidate countries. At the same time, financial and technical assistance from the EU contributes to accelerating the reform process.

Conclusions. The study confirms that assistance from the side of the European Union plays a decisive role in harmonizing legislation and reforming administrative structures in candidate countries. At the same time, effective implementation of EU governance standards ensures transparency, efficiency and accountability of public administration, which is important for EU integration. In future studies, it is planned to compare the success of reforms in different candidate countries to identify the best experience for its implementation in domestic practice

References

Bostan, S. K., & Nemchenko, G. (2018). From the experience of the anti-corruption struggle of law enforcement agencies in Romania: Success factors. Law and Society, 5(2), 10–15] [in Ukrainian]. [Бостан, С. К., & Немченко, Г. (2018). З досвіду антикорупційної боротьби правоохоронних органів в Румунії: Фактори успіху. Право і суспільство, 5(2), 10–15].

Chubai-Fedorenko, H. (2012). Problems of cross-border cooperation of Ukraine in the conditions of an expanded European Union. International relations of Ukraine: Scientific searches and findings, 21, 228–243 [in Ukrainian]. [Чубай-Федоренко, Г. (2012). Проблеми транскордонного співробітництва України в умовах розширеного Європейського Союзу. Міжнародні зв'язки України: Наукові пошуки і знахідки, 21, 228–243].

EU support for the rule of law in the Western Balkans: Despite efforts, fundamental problems persist. (2022). European Court of Auditors. https://op.europa.eu/webpub/eca/special-reports/eu-support-to-the-rule-of-law-in-Western-Balkans-01-2022/en/

Falaleieva, L. H. (2017). The role of the Copenhagen criteria in the implementation of EU values. Scientific Notes of the Institute of Legislation of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 1, 114–122 [in Ukrainian]. [Фалалєєва, Л. Г. (2017). Роль Копенгагенських критеріїв у реалізації цінностей Європейського Союзу. Наукові записки Інституту законодавства Верховної Ради України, 1, 114–122].

Hlushchenko, S. V. (2004). Reforming the banking systems of Central and Eastern European countries. Scientific Notes of National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy: Economic Sciences, 30, 39–47 [in Ukrainian]. [Глущенко, С. В. (2004). Реформування банківських систем країн Центральної та Східної Європи. Наукові записки НаУКМА: Економічні науки, 30, 39–47].

Letnar Černič, J., Avbelj, M., Novak, M., & Valentinčič, D. (2019). Reform of democracy and the rule of law in Slovenia. Nova Univerza-Evropska pravna fakulteta.

Makarenko, M. (2021). World practice of transformational changes in the field of health care. Investytsiyi: Praktyka ta dosvid, 17, 119–122 [in Ukrainian]. [Макаренко, М. В. (2021). Світова практика трасформаційних змін у сфері охорони здоров'я. Інвестиції: Практика та досвід, 17, 119–122]. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2021.17.119

On the Antimonopoly committee of Ukraine, Law of Ukraine № 3659-XII (2024) (Ukraine) [in Ukrainian]. [Про Антимонопольний комітет України, Закон України № 3659-XII (2024) (Україна)]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3659-12#Text

Pejić, I. (2022). Constitutional referendum and judicial reform in Serbia. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, 94, 75–92. https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0350-8501/2022/0350-85012294075P.pdf

Presidency conclusions. Copenhagen European Council. (1993). European Council. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/enlargement/ec/pdf/cop_en.pd

Rybak, N. V. (2020). Legal regulation of labor legislation efficiency evaluation in Lithuania. Social Law, 3, 36–39 [in Ukrainian]. [Рибак, Н. В. (2020). Правове регулювання оцінювання ефективності трудового законодавства у Литві. Social Law, 3, 36–39]. https://doi.org/10.37440/soclaw.2020.03.06

Sigér, F. (2020). Economic integration and interdependence in Croatia. In Z. Felméry (Ed.), Economic integration and interdependence in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 55–88). Dialóg Campus.

TAIEX institutional building tool. (n.d.). Center for Adaptation of the Civil Service to the Standards of the European Union [in Ukrainian]. [Інструмент інституціональної розбудови TAIEX. (б. д.). Центр адаптації державної служби до стандартів Європейського Союзу]. https://www.center.gov.ua/ component/k2/item/747-%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%BB%D1%96%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%86%D1%B6%D1%96%D0%B9%D0%BD%D1%B6-%D1%84% D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B8-taiex

Teremtsova, N. V. (2011). Theoretical and legal problems of EU enlargement: Current state and prospects. Legal Bulletin, 1, 51–53 [in Ukrainian]. [Теремцова, Н. В. (2011). Теоретико-правові проблеми розширення Європейського Союзу: Сучасний стан та перспективи. Юридичний вісник, 1, 51–53].

Twinning institutional building tool. (2022, January 27). Center for Adaptation of the Civil Service to the Standards of the European Union [in Ukrainian]. [Інструмент інституціональної розбудови Twinning. (2022, 27 січня). Центр адаптації державної служби до стандартів Європейського Союзу]. https://www.center.gov.ua/component/k2/item/4017-%D1%96%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B 5%D0%BD%D1%82-%D1%96%D0%BD%D1%B6%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%83%D1%B6%D1%96%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1% 8C%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%97-%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8-twinning

Varnalieva, J., & Madzova, V. (2015). Benefits of twinning programs: The case of Macedonia. In UBT International Conference (pp. 103–110). UBT Knowledge Center. https://knowledgecenter.ubt-uni.net/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2073&context=conference

Zioło, M., Niedzielski, P., Kuzionko-Ochrymiuk, E., Marcinkiewicz, J., Łobacz, K., Dyl, K., & Szanter, R. (2022). E-Government development in European countries: Socio-economic and environmental aspects. Energies, 15(23), 8870. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15238870

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

LIUSTEI, V., & KLYMENKO, N. (2025). THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION IN THE HARMONIZATION OF THE LEGISLATION AND REFORM OF ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURES OF THE CANDIDATE COUNTRIES. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Public Administration, 20(2), 41-45. https://doi.org/10.17721/2616-9193.2024/20-7/12