THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF SUSTAINABLE LAND USE AS AN OBJECT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/2616-9193.2024/19-15/22Keywords:
land resources; sustainable land use; public administrators; factors of sustainable land use; stages of formation of sustainable land use.Abstract
Background . Land use is essential in many environmental and socio-economic problems of society. The main form of land management is public management. Public management (or administration) in the field of rational management, use, and protection of land means that the state, in the person of its competent bodies, establishes certain rules and regulations regarding the organization of the use of all land resources of the country and its individual parts (categories of land, types of land use and etc.). Public administration lays the foundations of relations that should serve the protection, preservation, and careful use of land resources and be committed to the principle of sustainable development. The essence of the formation and development of sustainable land use is that all its subjects are included in this process. They must understand that it is necessary to abandon land redistribution if it is not necessary. Since the policy of sustainable land use is gaining more and more attention and importance both in the world and in Ukraine, the purpose of the article is to research and analyze the theoretical foundations of sustainable land use as an object of public management. The research object was sustainable land use.
Methods . This publication is based on the use of general and special research methods. The analysis was used to clarify the condition of land management in Ukraine, and synthesis was used to summarize the obtained evidence in order to develop recommendations. The systematic approach was used to study the challenges in the field of modern land use. The normative-value method made it possible to consider the issue of restoring sustainable land use in the postwar period in a multi-level management system.
Results . The analysis of sustainable land use made it possible to define the concept of sustainable land use, identify the factors affecting such land use, and consider the stages of the formation of sustainable land use in the multi-level management system. In particular, certain hierarchies of levels of sustainable land use administration were established, namely conceptual, ideological, political, and economic. Each level determines the conceptual mechanisms of actions in relation to land resources. Among the factors of influence on sustainable land use, those due to economic, natural, ecological, legal, technological, and social nature were distinguished. However, urbanization and cultural worldviews have also influenced the sustainable use and management of land resources. At the same time, understanding the jurisdiction of public managers, setting clear goals, developing initiatives for these goals, monitoring and evaluating progress, reporting, and cooperating and partnering were determined as the relevant stages of forming sustainable land use in a multi-level management system.
Сonclusions . Thus, sustainable land use requires the involvement of all parties interested in land use, taking into account their needs and supporting the broader cultural, economic, environmental, legal, political, technological, and social frameworks. In addition, the state needs to increase the category of nature conservation lands by creating parks, nature reserves, etc. At the legislative level, it is necessary to establish the principle of land use for the purpose of carrying out economic activities only on developed lands where there is a housing stock and developed infrastructure.
References
Гунько, Л. А. (2022). Формування сталого (збалансованого) землекористування – базова основа розвитку економіки землевпорядкування в Україні. Агросвіт, 9–10, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6792.2022.9-10.51
Кульбака, В. М. (2020). Концептуальні основи формування сільськогосподарських землекористувань в умовах сталого розвитку. Український журнал прикладної економіки, 5(2), 282–288. https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2020-2-33
Третяк, А. М., Третяк, В. М., Курильців, Р. М., Прядка, Т. М., & Третяк, Н. А. (2021а). Управління земельними ресурсами та земле користуванням: базові засади теорії, інституціолізації, практики. ТОВ "Бiлоцеркiвдрук".
Третяк, А. М., Третяк, В. М., Трофименко, П. І., Прядка, Т. М. & Трофименко, Н. В. (2021b). Стале (збалансоване) землекористування: понятійний базис та методологія інституціолізації. Агросвіт, 24, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306&6792.2021.24.11
Цілі сталого розвитку. (2021, 26 листопада). Дія. Бізнес. https://business.diia.gov.ua/handbook/sustainable-development-goals/cili-stalogo-rozvitku
Шарий, Г. І., Тимошевський, В. В., Міщенко, Р. А., & Юрко, І. А. (2019). Управління земельними ресурсами. ПолтНТУ.
Alix-Garcia, J. M., Sims, K.R.E., Orozco-Olvera, V. H., & Monroy, S. R. (2018). Payments for environmental services supported social capital while increasing land management. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 115(27), 7016–7021. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720873115
Batunacun, Wieland, R., Lakes, T., Yunfeng, H., & Nendel, C. (2019). Identifying drivers of land degradation in Xilingol, China, between 1975 and 2015. Land Use Policy, 83, 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.013
Böcher, M. (2012). A theoretical framework for explaining the choice of instruments in environmental policy. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.03.012
Enemark, S. (2009). Sustainable land governance. Coordinates, 5(12) 27–33. http://mycoordinates.org/volume-v-issues-12-dec-2009/
Kemper, L., Bader, K., & Froese, F. (2019). Promoting gender equality in a challenging environment: The case of Scandinavian subsidiaries in Japan. Personnel Review, 48(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2017-0035
Khan, S., & Ahmad Hanjra, M. (2008). Sustainable land and water management policies and practices: A pathway to environmental sustainability in large irrigation systems. Land Degradation and Development, 19(5), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.852
Lambin, E. F., Meyfroidt, P., Rueda, X., Blackman, A., Börner, J., Cerutti, P.O., Dietsch, Th., Jungmann, L., Lamarque, P., Lister, J., Walker, N. F.,& Wunder, S. (2014). Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions. Global Environmental Change, 28, 129–140.
Poltavets, A. (2021). Factors and indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of land resource management at agrarian enterprises. Актуальні проблеми інноваційної економіки, 2, 97–101. https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2021-2-16
Rissman, A. R., Kohl, P. A., & Wardropper, Ch. B. (2017). Public support for carrot, stick, and no-government water quality policies. Environmental Science & Policy, 76, 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.012
Towards sustainable land use: Aligning biodiversity, climate and food policies. (2020). OECD. https://www.oecd.org/environment/resources/towards-sustainable-land-use-aligning-biodiversity-climate-and-food-policies.pdf
Zhang L, Kuang B, & Yang B. (2023). Sustainable land use and management. Sustainability, 15(23), 16259. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316259
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Be sure to check the conditions by the link bellow: https://gov.bulletin.knu.ua/7
